55+ Bad Inventions in the History

Have you ever thought about how many inventions are out there designed to make our lives easier? It’s pretty amazing! But, let’s be real, there are also some pretty useless and even harmful inventions out there too. That’s why we’ve put together a list of the 50 bad inventions ever. Trust us, you won’t believe some of the things people have come up with!

Following is the Telefeed’s latest list of some of the world’s not-so-bright ideas. They’ve got everything from the wacky and wild to the downright dangerous, and they’re not ranked in any particular order. Check it out!

Segway

The Segway was a two-wheeled, self-balancing personal transportation device that was invented in 2001 by Dean Kamen. It was supposed to revolutionize transportation and replace walking, but it didn’t quite catch on as expected.

There were several reasons why the Segway is considered a bad invention. First and foremost, it was expensive, with a price tag of around $5,000, making it unaffordable for most people. Secondly, it was difficult to ride and maneuver, with a steep learning curve, which made it impractical for most people to use for daily transportation. Lastly, it was marketed as a device that would change the way cities were designed, but it ended up being banned in many cities due to safety concerns.

As you can see, it was a unique and futuristic-looking device, but unfortunately, it just didn’t live up to the hype.

New Coke

“New Coke” was a reformulation of the Coca-Cola soft drink that was introduced by The Coca-Cola Company in 1985. It was marketed as a new and improved version of the original Coke formula, but it turned out to be a major flop.

One of the main reasons “New Coke” was considered a bad invention was because of the backlash from consumers who preferred the taste of the original formula. People were outraged that their beloved Coke was being changed, and many boycotted the new product. The negative response was so strong that Coca-Cola had to bring back the original formula, which they rebranded as “Coca-Cola Classic.”

In addition to the negative response from consumers, “New Coke” also faced criticism from marketing experts who felt that the company had made a major misstep by tampering with a product that had such a strong emotional connection with consumers.

Overall, “New Coke” is considered a bad invention because it was an attempt to fix something that wasn’t broken, and it ended up damaging the brand and causing a lot of confusion and disappointment among consumers.

Hydrogen Blimps

“Hydrogen blimps” were an early form of air transportation that used blimps filled with hydrogen gas for lift. They were developed in the early 20th century and were used for various purposes, including military reconnaissance and passenger travel.

One of the main reasons hydrogen blimps are considered a bad invention is because of the danger posed by the highly flammable hydrogen gas. There were several high-profile accidents involving hydrogen blimps, including the 1937 Hindenburg disaster, in which a German passenger airship caught fire and crashed, killing 36 people.

After the Hindenburg disaster, the use of hydrogen blimps for passenger travel declined rapidly, and they were largely replaced by helium blimps, which are much less flammable. While hydrogen blimps are still used for some purposes, such as advertising and scientific research, they are generally considered to be a risky and outdated technology.

Overall, hydrogen blimps are considered a bad invention because of the significant safety risks they pose, as well as their limited practical applications in today’s world.

Farmville

FarmVille was a popular online game that was launched by Zynga in 2009. It was a social farming simulation game that allowed players to create and manage virtual farms, grow crops, and raise livestock. While FarmVille was hugely popular at its peak, it is often considered a bad invention because of several reasons.

Firstly, FarmVille was a prime example of the addictive nature of social media and online gaming. Many players found themselves spending countless hours tending to their virtual farms, often at the expense of real-life responsibilities like work and family.

Secondly, the game was often criticized for being overly commercialized, with many in-game features requiring players to spend real money to progress. This led to accusations of exploitation and a backlash from players who felt that the game was too focused on monetization rather than providing a fun and engaging experience.

Lastly, FarmVille was also criticized for its impact on the environment, with some experts claiming that the game promoted unsustainable farming practices and a lack of environmental awareness.

While FarmVille undoubtedly had its positive aspects, such as providing a sense of community and social interaction for players, it is often considered a bad invention due to its addictive nature, commercialization, and environmental impact.

Parachute Jacket

The Parachute Jacket was an invention that was developed in the early 20th century. It was a type of jacket that was designed to double as a parachute in case of emergency, allowing the wearer to safely parachute to the ground.

The Parachute Jacket is considered a bad invention for several reasons. Firstly, it was never proven to be effective in practice, as there were several reports of the jacket failing to properly deploy and resulting in injury or death for the wearer.

Secondly, the Parachute Jacket was often criticized for promoting a false sense of security, as wearers may have relied too heavily on the jacket’s supposed parachute capabilities without proper training or equipment.

Lastly, the Parachute Jacket was seen as an unnecessary and potentially dangerous addition to air travel, as it added extra weight and bulk to the passenger’s luggage.

Overall, the Parachute Jacket is considered a bad invention because of its questionable effectiveness, promotion of false security, and potential risks to air travel safety. While the idea of a wearable parachute may seem like a good one in theory, the Parachute Jacket ultimately failed to live up to its promise and was not a practical or safe solution for emergency situations.

Baby Cage

The Baby Cage was an invention that was popularized in the 1920s and 1930s. It was essentially a metal cage that was attached to the outside of a high-rise building and used to hold a baby, allowing the child to get fresh air and sunshine while the parent was inside.

The Baby Cage is considered a bad invention for several reasons. Firstly, it was seen as potentially dangerous, as there was a risk of the cage falling from the building or the child being injured while inside.

Secondly, the Baby Cage was criticized for its inhumane and neglectful nature, as it essentially treated the baby like a pet that could be left outside in a cage for extended periods of time.

Lastly, the Baby Cage was seen as a reflection of the societal pressures faced by working mothers at the time, who were often expected to balance childcare and work responsibilities without adequate support or resources.

Overall, the Baby Cage is considered a bad invention because of its potential risks to child safety, inhumane nature, and reflection of the societal pressures faced by working mothers in the early 20th century. While the idea of providing fresh air and sunshine for a child may seem like a good one in theory, the Baby Cage was ultimately a misguided and unsafe solution to this problem.

Clippy

Clippy was an animated character that was introduced in Microsoft Office 97 as a virtual assistant to help users navigate the software. Clippy was intended to be a helpful and user-friendly addition to Microsoft Office, but it is often considered a bad invention for several reasons.

Firstly, Clippy was often seen as intrusive and annoying, as it would often interrupt the user with unsolicited advice or suggestions. Many users found the constant interruptions to be distracting and frustrating, leading to a backlash against Clippy.

Secondly, Clippy was criticized for being too simplistic and not very effective as a virtual assistant. Many users found that the suggestions provided by Clippy were not helpful or relevant to their needs, and the character’s limited functionality made it more of a distraction than a useful tool.

Lastly, Clippy was also seen as a symbol of the corporate culture at Microsoft, which was often seen as out of touch with the needs and desires of its users. The introduction of Clippy was seen as a misguided attempt to make Microsoft Office more user-friendly, but it ultimately backfired and contributed to a negative perception of the software.

Overall, Clippy is considered a bad invention because of its intrusive and annoying nature, limited functionality, and association with a corporate culture that was seen as out of touch with its users. While the idea of a virtual assistant to help users navigate software may seem like a good one in theory, Clippy ultimately failed to live up to its promise and was not a successful addition to Microsoft Office.

Tanning Beds

Tanning beds are a type of equipment that emits ultraviolet (UV) radiation to artificially darken the skin. While they were initially seen as a revolutionary way to achieve a year-round tan without exposure to the sun’s harmful rays, they are now considered a bad invention for several reasons.

Firstly, tanning beds have been linked to an increased risk of skin cancer. The UV radiation emitted by tanning beds can damage the DNA in skin cells, leading to mutations that can cause skin cancer. Studies have found that people who use tanning beds are at a significantly higher risk of developing melanoma, the deadliest form of skin cancer.

Secondly, tanning beds can also cause premature aging of the skin. The UV radiation can break down collagen and elastin fibers in the skin, leading to wrinkles, sagging, and other signs of aging.

Lastly, tanning beds are also associated with other health risks, such as eye damage, immune system suppression, and vitamin D deficiency.

Overall, tanning beds are considered a bad invention because of their association with increased risk of skin cancer and premature aging of the skin, as well as other health risks. While they were initially marketed as a safe and convenient way to achieve a tan, it is now widely recognized that the risks associated with tanning beds far outweigh any potential benefits.

Crocs

Crocs are a type of shoe made from a proprietary foam resin material called Croslite. They were first introduced in 2002 and quickly gained popularity due to their comfortable fit, lightweight design, and bright colors. While Crocs are not universally considered a bad invention, they have been criticized for several reasons.

Firstly, Crocs are often seen as unattractive or “ugly” due to their chunky, clog-like appearance. While they were initially marketed as functional shoes for outdoor activities, they have since become a fashion statement for some people. However, their unconventional design is not universally appealing and has been criticized by some for being unsightly.

Secondly, there have been concerns about the environmental impact of Crocs. The shoes are made from a type of foam resin that is not biodegradable, meaning they can take hundreds of years to decompose in landfills. This has led to calls for the company to develop more sustainable materials for their shoes.

Lastly, there have also been concerns about the comfort and safety of wearing Crocs. While they are known for their comfortable fit, some podiatrists have warned that they may not provide adequate support for the feet and can lead to foot pain or injury. There have also been reports of Crocs getting caught in escalators, leading to injuries.

Overall, while Crocs are not universally considered a bad invention, they have been criticized for their unconventional appearance, environmental impact, and potential safety and comfort concerns. Despite these criticisms, they remain popular among many people due to their comfort and convenience.

More bad inventions that you should know: –